```html

Git Rebase vs. Git Merge: Understanding the Differences

When distinguishing between Git rebase and Git merge, it's important to comprehend their unique functionalities and optimal use cases.

Git Rebase:

• Rebasing is a method used in Git to integrate changes from one branch into another by moving the entire branch to a new base commit.
• Rebasing provides a cleaner and linear project history by incorporating changes as if they were made on top of the current branch.
• It is suitable for keeping a clean and organized commit history, especially in feature branches or pull requests.
• However, rebasing should be avoided on public branches shared with other developers to prevent conflicts and history rewriting.

Git Merge:

• Merging is a process in Git that combines changes from one branch to another by creating a new commit that joins the histories of both branches.
• Merging preserves the complete history of all changes made in the project, maintaining the individual characteristics of each branch.
• It is typically used for integrating feature branches, bug fixes, and other changes that need to be combined with the main development branch.
• Merge commits can sometimes clutter the project history, but they provide a transparent record of all changes merged into the branch.

In conclusion, use Git rebase when aiming for a linear and clean commit history, especially in feature branches, while Git merge is best suited for integrating changes while maintaining the original branch history intact.

```