**

Understanding the Difference Between EIGRP Feasible Successor and Backup Route

**

In EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol), the **feasible successor** and **backup route** are two crucial concepts that play a significant role in ensuring network reliability and efficiency.

**Focus Keyword:** EIGRP feasible successor and backup route

**Feasible Successor:** In EIGRP, a feasible successor is a route that is considered as a potential backup path to the primary route to a destination. It is selected based on the Successor Route Feasibility Condition, which states that the reported distance of the feasible successor must be lower than the the current feasible distance.

**Backup Route:** On the other hand, a backup route in EIGRP refers to an alternative route that is used when the primary route (successor route) becomes unavailable. Although the backup route might have a higher metric compared to the feasible successor, it provides redundancy and failover support in case of network failures.

In summary, while the **feasible successor** is a path that meets specific criteria and is ready to take over if needed, the **backup route** serves as a secondary option that can be activated when the primary route fails. Understanding the distinction between these two concepts is crucial for optimizing EIGRP network performance and ensuring seamless routing operations.

**

Remember, leveraging both feasible successors and backup routes is essential for creating a robust and reliable EIGRP network infrastructure.

**