suresh When it comes to version control in Git, understanding the difference between git merge and git rebase is crucial for effective collaboration and maintaining a clean commit history.
Git merge combines the changes from one branch into another, creating a new commit for the merge. This preserves the commit history of both branches, resulting in a more linear history but with additional merge commits scattered throughout.
Git rebase, on the other hand, rewrites the commit history by incorporating the changes of one branch onto another as if they were originally created in that branch. This results in a cleaner, more linear history without extra merge commits, but it can also alter the commit hashes and potentially create conflicts.
In summary, while git merge is more suitable for preserving history and collaboration between team members, git rebase is preferred for maintaining a cleaner and more organized commit history.
Please login or Register to submit your answer